Subject: Rear End Accident

Auto v. Auto: Rear End

Published: 09/15/2019

Our client was rear-ended on the freeway at night with her son in the backseat. Her son was not injured and our client suffered from minor muscle sprains/strains. However, the accident caused our client to suffer from a lot of anxiety. Despite the minor property damage and low medical bills, we were able to settle…

View Story →

Auto v. Auto (Driver and Passenger)

Published: 08/10/2019

Our firm represented both the driver and passenger in a rear end accident. Shortly after the accident, they reached out to our office for representation. When they called, neither of them had seen a doctor despite their lower back pain. We set them up with treatment and resolved their claims for more than double their medical bills.

View Story →

Auto v. Auto Accident

Published: 07/20/2019

Our client was rear-ended at high speed. He suffered injures to his back and knee and was recommended an epidural injection and bone marrow stem cell injection. The insurance company initially offered was $40,000. After weeks of negotiating, we were able to settle the case for $115,000 (almost four times his total medical bills).

View Story →

Auto v. Auto Accident: Wrist Injury

Published: 07/15/2019

Our client’s wrist injury was aggravated as a result of a rear-end accident. After she contacted our office, we were able to get her the treatment she needed. Although client’s car did not sustain significant property damage, we were able to secure the defendant’s policy limits of $100,000 without having to file a lawsuit.

View Story →

Auto v. Auto Accident: Rear End

Published: 07/10/2019

As a result of the accident, our client sustained whiplash, headaches and lower back pain. Despite these injuries, the insurance company refused to make an acceptable offer. Therefore, we had to file a lawsuit. Less than 6 months after the complaint was filed, the insurance company offered their insured’s $100,000 policy to resolve the claim.

View Story →

Auto v. Bus Accident: Rear End

Published: 07/05/2019

Although liability was clear, the bus company was non-responsive and did not provide their insurance information. However, our team’s persistence resulted in a settlement of $23,000 which was more than three times our client’s medical bills.

View Story →

Auto v. Auto (Client with pre-existing injury)

Published: 06/20/2019

Client with prior neck injury was rear-ended and pushing into the car in front of her by an uninsured driver, which aggravated her existing neck injury. We were able to secure policy limits of $50,000 for her in under 1 year.

View Story →

Auto v. Auto

Published: 06/12/2019

Our client was rear-ended while pregnant. As a result of her pregnancy, she was unable to get much treatment. Because of her lack of treatment, the insurance company initially refused to make an offer. However, we were able to get them to pay the full policy limits without having to file a lawsuit.

View Story →

Auto v. Auto – Back to Back Accidents

Published: 06/05/2019

Our client was involved in a rear end accident that caused minimal damage to his car. The at-fault party, however, was not insured. Therefore, our client presented an uninsured motorist claim with his insurance company for injuries sustained. The insurance company’s initial offer was less than our client’s medical bills and less than half his…

View Story →

*A study by the Insurance Research Council found that people who hire an experienced lawyer after an accident file claims at least 3.5 times larger than those without one. No guarantees made, every case is different.